People and the planet — A report from the Royal Society

There are two import­ant pieces of ‘grey lit­er­at­ure’ today: the first, from the Royal Society, is a report on how global pop­u­la­tion and con­sump­tion are linked, and the implic­a­tions for a finite planet. There was also a use­ful inter­view on the UK radio pro­gramme “Today” about 6.45 am; since the pro­gramme is still run­ning I can’t post a link to “listen again”, but it may be at http://​www​.bbc​.co​.uk/​p​r​o​g​r​a​m​m​e​s​/​b​0​1​g​h​c41. The second report is about the eco­nomic case for invest­ing in the envir­on­ment.

The global report from the RS com­mit­tee, led by Sir John Sulston, emphas­izes the prob­lem of unsus­tain­able con­sump­tion in indus­tri­al­ized coun­tries and unsus­tain­able pop­u­la­tion growth in devel­op­ing coun­tries, with many obvi­ous cross-overs as the poor increase their con­sump­tion (not least of meat), and con­sump­tion con­verts to envir­on­mental degrad­a­tion in the developed world.

With its clear writ­ing and import­ant mes­sage, as would be expec­ted from the Royal Society, there is little point in my para­phras­ing the suc­cinct report sum­mary here, so hence I am quot­ing the sum­mary in full:

Rapid and wide­spread changes in the world’s human pop­u­la­tion, coupled with unpre­ced­en­ted levels of con­sump­tion present pro­found chal­lenges to human health and well­being, and the nat­ural envir­on­ment. This report gives an over­view of how global pop­u­la­tion and con­sump­tion are linked, and the implic­a­tions for a finite planet.

Working Group chair Sir John Sulston FRS, Chair of the Institute for Science, Ethics & Innovation, University of Manchester.
Key recommendations

Key recom­mend­a­tions include:

The inter­na­tional com­munity must bring the 1.3 bil­lion people liv­ing on less than $1.25 per day out of abso­lute poverty, and reduce the inequal­ity that per­sists in the world today. This will require focused efforts in key policy areas includ­ing eco­nomic devel­op­ment, edu­ca­tion, fam­ily plan­ning and health.

The most developed and the emer­ging eco­nom­ies must sta­bil­ise and then reduce mater­ial con­sump­tion levels through: dra­matic improve­ments in resource use effi­ciency, includ­ing: redu­cing waste; invest­ment in sus­tain­able resources, tech­no­lo­gies and infra­struc­tures; and sys­tem­at­ic­ally decoup­ling eco­nomic activ­ity from envir­on­mental impact.

Reproductive health and vol­un­tary fam­ily plan­ning pro­grammes urgently require polit­ical lead­er­ship and fin­an­cial com­mit­ment, both nation­ally and inter­na­tion­ally. This is needed to con­tinue the down­ward tra­ject­ory of fer­til­ity rates, espe­cially in coun­tries where the unmet need for con­tra­cep­tion is high.

Population and the envir­on­ment should not be con­sidered as two sep­ar­ate issues. Demographic changes, and the influ­ences on them, should be factored into eco­nomic and envir­on­mental debate and plan­ning at inter­na­tional meet­ings, such as the Rio+20 Conference on Sustainable Development and sub­sequent meetings.

Other recom­mend­a­tions made in the report focus on:

the poten­tial for urb­an­isa­tion to reduce mater­ial con­sump­tion
remov­ing bar­ri­ers to achieve high-quality primary and sec­ond­ary edu­ca­tion for all
under­tak­ing more research into the inter­ac­tions between con­sump­tion, demo­graphic change and envir­on­mental impact
imple­ment­ing com­pre­hens­ive wealth meas­ures
devel­op­ing new socio-economic systems. ”


Editor Pat Heslop-Harrison. ORCID 0000-0002-3105-2167

Pat Heslop-Harrison is Professor of Molecular Cytogenetics and Cell Biology at the University of Leicester. He is also Chief Editor of Annals of Botany.

Pin It on Pinterest

Liked this?

Be the first to share this post with your friends!